Our Members are our purpose and the foundation of our community. As a member organization, we exist for YOU.
Are you a Chamber Member with an issue or concern? Do you have a project we can help with? Let us know!
Where we represent & SUpport our Members*:
-ACCC (Association for Colorado Chambers of Commerce) (State-Wide)
-Action 22 (Regional)
-Broadband Coalition
-C3 Steering Committee (Regional)
-City of Alamosa Main Street Advisory Committee
-Colorado Creative District Committee
-Early Childhood Community Stakeholders Advisory Group
-Economic Development Advisory Board
-Ice Fest Planning Committee
-Letter of Recommendation for Chamber Members and other projects aligning with our Advocacy Policy
-Local Coordinating Organization (LCO) - Universal Preschool Advisory Group
-Rally for Air Service (Nationwide)
-Revitalize the Rio
-San Luis Valley Healthcare Sector Partnership
-San Luis Valley Little Learners Academy (SLVLLA) Board of Directors
-San Luis Valley Regional Airport Board
-San Luis Valley Regional Airport Marketing Committee
-Save Small Business Coalition (Nationwide)
-SLVH Community Health Needs Assessment Bi-Annual Group
-Small Business Development Center Support
-Small Business Saturday® Official Neighborhood Champion
-Summerfest on the Rio Event Board
*Executive Director or Board Member sit on board/committee directly on behalf of the Alamosa Chamber and its Members.
Your Chamber Works for You
In addition to promotional benefits, your Chamber is always working on your behalf. Late October it was announced that long with nearly 900 other locations nationwide, our UPS service counter would be closing. This would have left our community without an important resource for quality of life and would have severely impacted our business' ability to do e-commerce.
We are happy to report that after many discussions with our local UPS, and a brief closure of the customer service counter, they took a closer look at our situation in Alamosa and reopened earlier this November.
This is a huge win for our community and we want to extend our gratitude to our local UPS for hearing us and staying open for our community. THANK YOU UPS!
Current Stances
There are many Bills to be aware of that have been nicknamed ‘Job Killers”. We recommend taking the time to look into each bill, and to reach out to representatives regarding concerns and examples of how these can negatively affect your business.
Support of EDCC's efforts in codifying HB 24-1160, Economic Development Organization Action Grant Program into OEDIT
PAST ADVOCACY/STANCES 2023
Past Issues/Stances
OPPOSE: HB 23-1118 Fair Workweek Bill
HB 1118 would have a sweeping impact on thousands of public & private employers, place new restrictions on scheduling practices & hurt those it intends to help. It is the most punitive proposal in the country & fails to consider basic operational needs of businesses, social service providers, public & private schools, healthcare providers & others…
SUPPORT: SB23-001 Authority of Public-private Collaboration Unit For Housing Summary:
This bill allows the Authority of Public-Private Collaboration in the Department of Administration to engage in housing projects on unused state properties.
Justification:
Housing is one of the most pressing issues facing Colorado communities and employers. This proposal allows the state to use state properties to develop needed housing in communities across the state.
SUPPORT: SB23-006 Creation Of The Rural Opportunity Office
Summary:
This bill creates the Rural Opportunity Office in the Office of Economic Development. The Office is charged with supporting Colorado’s rural communities, economic development offices, business support organizations and small businesses to explore economic development and business opportunities in rural communities across the state.
Justification:
The Rural Opportunity Office fosters and promotes economic resiliency and provides economic development support to rural regions such as ours.
SUPPORT: HB23-1035 Statute Of Limitations Minimum Wage Violations
Summary:
This bill would create a standard 2-year time limit on minimum wage violations.
Justification:
Colorado’s minimum wage law, which applies to much more than just minimum wages and those employees, does not have an articulated statute of limitations. As a result, there is no set rule and judges are imposing differing time limits on claims, exposing employers to uncertain liability, particularly in class actions. Other state and federal wage laws have a standard 2-year time limit on claims. Employers and employees need the predictability of knowing when a wage claim may be brought, and our Legal Advisory Committee highly recommends supporting this bill.
OFFICIAL STANCES 2022
Supports the Chips for America Act (National)
The Alamosa County Chamber of Commerce OPPOSES the Renewable Water Resources (RWR) proposal to Douglas County and other efforts to divert water from the SLV. (Regional)
The Alamosa County Chamber of Commerce SUPPORTED the effort to recall District Attorney Alonzo Payne.
Past Updates:
2020 Ballot Issues
Official stances
“As a Chamber of Commerce in rural Colorado, the decision to oppose the NPV was an easy one. Our Mission as an organization is centered around support for our business community at it's core, and to give away our voice and our votes to other areas of the nation, particularly those with traditionally unfriendly business climates would not be supportive of that mission.” -Erin Keck, Executive Director, Alamosa County Chamber of Commerce
Other key issues for business
Ballot text: Without increasing property tax rates, to help preserve funding for local districts that provide fire protection, police, ambulance, hospital, kindergarten through twelfth grade education, and other services, and to avoid automatic mill levy increases, shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution to repeal the requirement that the general assembly periodically change the residential assessment rate in order to maintain the statewide proportion of residential property as compared to all other taxable property valued for property tax purposes and repeal the nonresidential property tax assessment rate of twenty-nine percent?
A "yes" vote supports the following:
repealing the Gallagher Amendment, which set residential and non-residential property tax assessment rates in the state constitution;
allowing the Colorado State Legislature to freeze property tax assessment rates at the current rates (7.15% for residential property and 29% for non-residential property);
allowing the state legislature to provide for future property tax assessment rate decreases through state law; and
continuing to require voter approval for rate increases due to TABOR.
A "no" vote supports:
maintaining the Gallagher Amendment, which requires a residential to non-residential property tax ratio of 45% to 55% and requires the state legislature to adjust the residential assessment rate to maintain the required ratio. Since 1982, the residential property tax assessment rate has dropped from 21% to 7.15% under the Gallagher Amendment.
How does this affect businesses?
If passed, will lessen the increasing tax burden on businesses in Colorado, thus helping to create a more business-friendly climate. Also has the potential to put Colorado in a better position to recruit more business and create jobs.
A "yes" vote supports:
establishing a paid family and medical leave program in Colorado to provide 12 weeks (up to 16 weeks in certain cases) of paid leave (with a maximum benefit of $1,100 per week)
funded through a payroll tax to be paid for by employers and employees in a 50/50 split
A "no" vote opposes:
establishing a paid family and medical leave program in Colorado.
How does this affect businesses?
This ballot initiative imposes a payroll tax increase on all Colorado families and businesses during an unprecedented pandemic where business have been faced with shutdowns and severe economic hardship. Concerns continue for how to keep businesses afloat and keeping Coloradans employed.
As this also is limited to businesses 10 employees and over, this initiative also creates an incentive for businesses not to grow as it creates a bigger financial burden to do so.
Ballot text: Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes concerning the creation of a paid family and medical leave program in Colorado, and, in connection therewith, authorizing paid family and medical leave for a covered employee who has a serious health condition, is caring for a new child or for a family member with a serious health condition, or has a need for leave related to a family member’s military deployment or for safe leave; establishing a maximum of 12 weeks of family and medical leave, with an additional 4 weeks for pregnancy or childbirth complications, with a cap on the weekly benefit amount; requiring job protection for and prohibiting retaliation against an employee who takes paid family and medical leave; allowing a local government to opt out of the program; permitting employees of such a local government and self-employed individuals to participate in the program; exempting employers who offer an approved private paid family and medical leave plan; to pay for the program, requiring a premium of 0.9% of each employee’s wages, up to a cap, through December 31, 2024, and as set thereafter, up to 1.2% of each employee’s wages, by the director of the division of family and medical leave insurance; authorizing an employer to deduct up to 50% of the premium amount from an employee’s wages and requiring the employer to pay the remainder of the premium, with an exemption for employers with fewer than 10 employees; creating the division of family and medical leave insurance as an enterprise within the department of labor and employment to administer the program; and establishing an enforcement and appeals process for retaliation and denied claims?